| Kisan Credit Card
Danish Faruqui
Provision of timely and adequate credit has been one of the major
challenges for banks in India in dispensation of agricultural and
rural credit to the farmers. Constant innovation is required in
order to achieve the aim. Agricultural credit cards are not a new
concept in the field of agricultural banking in India. The scheme
had already been introduced in a number of public sector banks in
a few states much earlier. These schemes were niche-marketed and
were exclusively preserved for the privileged class of farmers and
the small and marginal farmers did not have much access to them.
Similarly cash credit facilities were being extended by several
public sector banks and cooperative banks to farmers with the view
to improving their access to credit. Again this scheme was used
only selectively. The KCC scheme was started by the Government of
India (GOI) in consultation with the RBI (Reserve Bank of India)
and NABARD (National Bank for Agricultural and Rural Development)
1998-99 to join the features of both these schemes and to overcome
their shortcomings.
The features of the scheme at a glance are:
- Type of revolving cash credit facility with unlimited withdrawals
and repayments.
- Meet the production credit need, cultivation expenses, and contingency
expenses of the farmers.
- Limits based on the basis of operational land holding, cropping
pattern and scale of finance. This limit is inclusive of 20% of
production credit.
- Each withdrawal to be paid within 12 months.
- Card valid for 3 years subject to annual renewals.
- Credit limits can be enhanced depending on performance and needs.
- Rescheduling is also possible depending upon the situation.
If for example the crops fail due to a natural calamity and the
farmer is not able to repay his loan, then he could get an extension
of upto four years.
- Cash withdrawals through slips accompanied by card and passbook.
- A credit cum passbook would be issued.
- All branches engaged in agricultural lending could issue Kisan
Credit Cards.
Eligibility
Borrowers with good track record over the past 2 years would be
the prime customers. New borrowers could also be included if they
could get proof of operational land holding from the Patwari.
Target group
Short-term crop loans required by existing/new borrowers
Selection methodology
The farmer would be evaluated by the bank, on financial grounds
by looking at his past record with the bank, and on personal grounds
by looking at his reputation in the village.
Fixation of credit limit
The credit limit under the card may be fixed on the basis of the
operational land holding, cropping pattern and the scale of finance
by the District Level Technical Committee (DLTC) and SLTC. If the
limit has not been fixed by the DLTC/SLTC or the limit in the opinion
of the bank is low, appropriate scale of finance for the crop may
be fixed by the bank.
Validity and repayment schedule
A card once issued would be valid for a period of 3 years. The
facility may be extended, the amount enhanced or cancelled, depending
on the performance of the farmer. Repayments are to be made within
12 months of taking the credit.
Margin
- For loan amount upto Rs. 10,000: NIL
- For amount over Rs. 25,000: 15% to 25%
Collateral
- Loan Amount security to be furnished
- Upto Rs. 10,000 DPN (demand promissory note) / loan agreement
is needed only
- Rs. 10000 and upto Rs. 25,000 Hypothecation of crops is required.
- Above Rs. 25,000 Hypothecation of crops and mortgage of land
(or) third party guarantee is needed
Interest
This is subject to change.
Amount of Interest for Repayment period:
Upto one year Exceeding
one year
- Upto Rs. 25,000 11 % 11 %
- Above Rs. 25,000-Rs. 2,00,000 12 % 12 %
- Above Rs. 2,00,000-Rs. 25,00,000 13.5% 13.5%
(Depending on Credit Risk Rating) 13.25% to 15.5% 13.25% to
15.5%
By March 20, 2001, around 1,32,44,397 cards had been issued by
agencies all over the country, with the amount sanctioned close
to Rs. 24615.17 crore. Contributions of cooperative banks, RRB’s
and commercial banks have been 67.35%, 5.7%, and 27% respectively.
What we feel
Theoretically the scheme seems well thought of and full of good
intentions. Not only has availability of credit been made easier
but has also been made simple to get and operate. Farmers have been
given sufficient freedom to decide how to use their credit, while
at the same time a set repayment schedule has been provided. However
for this scheme to be successful, education of both the farmers
and also the bank officials about the scheme is required. Moreover
there is doubt whether this scheme is a window dressing of bad loans
made earlier, though this cannot be proved empirically as the scheme
is young and data is not easily available. This I believe would
be interesting to look into at a later stage.
|